Legal Opinion
Mason v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 22, 2016No. 3:14-cv-0107 JWSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
[Re: Motions at dockets 55 and 57]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. MOTIONS PRESENTED
At docket 55 plaintiff Maurice K. Mason (“Mason”) moves for judgment after a trial on the record pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 52 or, alternatively, summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. Defendants Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, Federal Express Corporation Short Term Disability Plan, and Federal Express Corporation Long Term Disability Plan (collectively, “Defendants”)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- County of Monterey v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Hewko v. Regence BlueshieldDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
- Rowekamp v. Providence Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Turkoly v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Woolsey v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020