Legal Opinion

Heacock v. Arnold

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1929No. 13,542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeal, P. J.

The appellant has assigned as error: The court erred in overruling the motion of the appellant for a new trial, and one of the causes is to the effect that the court erred in overruling appellant’s objection to question No. 1 propounded to each of the twelve jurors by the appellee on his voir dire, to wit: “Mr. --- (each of the twelve jurors selected), do you hold a policy in the State Automobile Insurance Association?”

Before we can consider the assigned error, two propositions advanced by the appellee must be answered, and if the answer be in the affirmative, the errors assigned cannot be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Annadall v. Union Cement & Lime Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Wassall Clay Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. H. W. Johns-Manville Co. v. South Shore Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. King's Indiana Billiard Co. v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Morrow, Inc. v. MUNSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Click v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Freeman v. Sup. Ct. Marion Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API