Legal Opinion
Stetser v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 3, 2004No. COA03-180PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCULLOUGH, Judge.
This case arises out of an order denying defendant Takeda’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction entered 17 October 2002. The pertinent facts are as follows: Plaintiffs are three North Carolina residents who purchased Lupron as part of their treatment for prostate cancer. Defendant Takeda Chemical Industries, Inc. (Takeda) is a Japanese corporation headquartered in Osaka, Japan. Plaintiffs allege that Takeda, TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. (TAP), Abbott Laboratories, and other defendants violated various laws in connection with the marketing and pricing of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Gemini Enterprises, Inc. v. WFMY Television Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Better Business Forms, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Padron v. Bentley Marine Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Bartlett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Bartlett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Bartlett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.