Legal Opinion
City of St. Cloud v. Willenbring
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1935No. 30,447PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. Olsen, Justice.
The defendant Seaboard Surety Company, a corporation, appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to the complaint of the plaintiff on the ground that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The plaintiff sued to recover the full amount of a bond given to the city of St. Cloud by the defendant Willenbring in connection with an “on-sale” nonintoxicating malt liquor license obtained by her from said city. The penalty in the bond was $1,000.
The legislature, by L. 1933, c. 116, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1931 Supp. §§ 3200-5 to 3200-10,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ZerbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- United States v. WandmakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- City of Minneapolis v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. VienupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- State ex rel. Summers v. Lake Tavern, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954