Legal Opinion

In re Heysham

New York City Family Court

Decided May 9, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony K. Pomilio, J.

This is a motion for permission to proceed on an appeal as a poor person pursuant to CPLR article 11. The issue is whether the income and the assets of the parents of a 14-year-old movant should be considered upon such application.

The motion arises in the context of a juvenile delinquency proceeding under Family Court Act article 3. After having been adjudged a juvenile delinquent, the movant’s Law Guardian filed a notice of appeal from that adjudication and then moved in this court for permission to proceed as a poor person under CPLR article 11.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenks v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Nicholas v. C. H. J. ReasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Fanelli v. BarclayNassau County District Court · 1979
  4. Errico v. Manville, New York County Courts1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel Fullan v. Commissioner of Corrections of the State of New York and the Justices of the Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Daniel Fullan v. Commissioner of Corrections of the State of New York and the Justices of the Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API