Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1973No. 672S78Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Opinion Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

DeBruler, J.

The only conduct shown by the findings of fact of the Hearing Officer which I consider to be violative of the standards for professional conduct is in advising a client not to pay child support as required by an existing and lawful court order, and in receiving such support payments. Such advice does not rise to the ethical standard set by Canon 7 which reads:

“A lawyer should represent a client zealously within the bounds of the law.”

Such advice is specifically prohibited by Disciplinary Rule 7-106 (A) which commands that:

“A lawyer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API