Legal Opinion

Brooks v. K.S.T., Inc.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided October 9, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00001Unknown

1Opinion

U.S.DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT “Pee FOR THE 2628 0CT -9 PM DISTRICT OF VERMONT □□ MICHAEL BROOKS, MARILYN BROOKS, ) BY and JOSEPH BROOKS, ) DEPUTY □□□□□ ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) Case No. 2:20-cv-00001 ) K.S.T., INC., d/b/a SNOWMOBILE ) VERMONT, and WE ARE SLEDS, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 6, 8, & 12) Plaintiffs Michael Brooks, Marilyn Brooks, and Joseph Brooks (collectively, Plaintiffs”) bring this suit against Defendants…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API