Thomas v. State

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Albert Vincent Thomas challenges his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child, asserting that a State’s witness was an improper outcry witness. We affirm.

Factual and Pkocedural Background

The State charged appellant by indictment with the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, appellant’s young stepdaughter, by causing the sexual organ of the child to contact appellant’s sexual organ. Appellant pleaded “not guilty” to the charged offense. Before trial, appellant filed a pre-trial motion for a determination of the State’s outcry…