Legal Opinion

Parno v. Kane

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 2019No. 1:16-cv-01949-SHRUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOPHER CARUSONE, : Civil Nos. 1:16-cv-1944, AND GLENN PARNO, : 1:16-cv-1949 : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : KATHLEEN KANE, RENEE : MARTIN, DAVID PEIFER, BRADEN : COOK, and WILLIAM NEMETZ : : Defendants. : Judge Sylvia H. Rambo M E M O R A N D U M Before the court is the letter/ motion to compel filed by Plaintiffs Christopher Carusone and Glenn Parno (“Plaintiffs”). For the reasons outlined below, the court shall grant the motion. I. Background This is a civil dispute arising from the former Pennsylvania Attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ehrlich v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  2. Shenker v. SportelliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Roberts v. LyonsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Langman v. KEYSTONE NAT'L BANK & TRUST CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Vista Del Sol Health Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API