Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 26, 2018No. Nos. 17-6165; 17-6195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.

Federal sentences can be affected by a defendant's classification as an armed career criminal or a career offender. Both classifications underlie these appeals, *1065which grew out of the sentencing and resentencing of Mr. Darius Johnson for possessing cocaine with intent to distribute ( 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) ) and being a felon in possession of a firearm ( 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) ).

For these offenses, the district court initially imposed concurrent prison terms of 192 months, relying in part on Mr. Johnson's classification as an armed career criminal because of three prior…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'Rs for San Miguel Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. WinrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API