Legal Opinion

Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc. v. Wilcox

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 29, 2000No. 84,396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc. (Deffenbaugh) and Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. (Hartford) appeal from a declaratory judgment granted to Dan Lykins, a Topeka attorney, and his client William E. Wilcox, in an action to recover attorney fees under K.S.A. 44-504. On appeal, Deffenbaugh and Hartford argue that they are not required to pay a proportionate share of Lykins’ attorney fees under K.S.A. 44-504 because Deffenbaugh and Hartford were reimbursed for workers compensation expenses under an indemnity contract and not under statutory subrogation. We agree and reverse.

On October 1,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ronnau v. Caravan International CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Flott v. Wenger Mixer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Golconda Screw, Inc. v. West Bottoms Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Nordstrom v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MaishCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lexington Ins. Co. v. Western Roofing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Miller v. DorrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  3. PMA GROUP v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API