Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Alpena Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Alcona; Connine, J. Case by Samuel Holcomb against the Alpena Power Company, Limited, for flooding plaintiff’s land. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The principal issue upon the trial was whether in maintaining and operating a dam defendant held or set back water on plaintiff’s lands to his damage and injury, in the years 1907, 1908,.and 1909. This issue the jury determined in plaintiff’s favor and assessed his damages. The jury answered in the negative the following special question:

“Was not plaintiff’s land during the years 1907, 1908, and 1909 more than five feet above the level of the water as maintained by the dam used to its fullest capacity, except as to the south end of the S. W. 14 of the N. W. % of section 7, town 28 north,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Byrd, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Holcomb v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Holcomb v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API