Bachman v. Gross
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 159, July T., 1891, by defendant, Amelia Gross et ah, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland Co., Sept. T., 1888, No. Ill, on verdict for plaintiff, W. D. Bachman et ux. Ejectment for land in defendant’s possession. Verdict for plaintiff for part and for defendant as to rest. No disclaimer having been filed, judgment was entered for plaintiff for full costs. Error assigned was such entry of judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This was an ejectment in the court below. The only speci- . fication of error is that the court imposed full costs, the de*517fendants not having filed a disclaimer. The ruling of the court below is so clearly right, and the appeal itself of such a trifling nature, that we not only affirm the judgment, but also impose the penalty of $20 counsel fee, provided by the act of assembly for frivolous appeals.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. RiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Wolf v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897