Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 1, 1976No. 46,316-A, CA 6347Published

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we agree with the finding of the trial court. Use of recently stolen property, together with a noncredible explanation as to the manner in which it came into possession, is sufficient proof of knowing use of stolen property. State v. Murphy, 253 Or 444, 446, 455 P2d 178 (1969).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1969