Legal Opinion

Van Dyck v. Abramsohn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1932No. 41146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, C. J.

The plaintiff began this action at law. The defendant filed her answer, alleging false and fraudulent representations as the inducement to her entering into the contract, and alleging rescission of the contract of purchase of the refrigeration equipment. In a counterclaim or cross-bill, she alleged a contract of purchase by her of the refrigeration equipment; alleged false and fraudulent representations by the plaintiff as the inducement of the purchase by her of said equipment; alleged rescission; alleged therein special damages by reason of the spoilage of meats, because the equipment was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. German Savings Bank of Des Moines v. Des Moines National Bank of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Brennan & Cohen v. Nolan Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Blecher v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Fulton Bank v. MathersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heyl v. BeadelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Hunt Truck Sales and Service, Inc. v. Omaha StandardDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1960
  3. Andreas & Son v. HempySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Robinson v. MainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API