Legal Opinion

Webb v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1909No. 2138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Indictment for assault with intent to rape; from Tift superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 3, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for the crime of assault with intent to rape, and was convicted. He complains of the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial. The original motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds, and the amended motion consists of twenty-seven special assignments of error. Many of the grounds set out in the motion for new trial are entirely without merit. Some contain immaterial errors which, on another trial, will probably not be repeated. We will consider only those grounds which we deem material and of sufficient importance to decide.

1. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sprayberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Warthen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API