Legal Opinion

Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 20, 1907No. 792PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 16, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to file supersedeas bond or pauper affidavit is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error.

2. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the garnishment proceedings; but did err in rendering judgment against the garnishee, for the reasons given in Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052), and cit., and in Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co., 2 Ga. App. 218 (58 S. E. 372). Judgment reversed.

Appeal, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 16, 1907. Submitted December 18, Decided December 20, 1907. Hendricks & Christian, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Fagan v. Jackson & OrmeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spooner v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. DeBarry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API