Legal Opinion
Neurorepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Group
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 15, 2015No. 2013-1073PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
The question before this court is whether a California state court malpractice case involving patent law representation was properly removed to a federal court. Under the principles of Gunn v. Minton, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1059, 185 L.Ed.2d 72 (2013), it was not.
Plaintiff-appellant NeuroRepair, Inc. (“NeuroRepair”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees The Nath Law Group and Robert P. Cogan (collectively, “Defendants”) on July 12, 2011, as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Inspired Development Group v. Inspired Products Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Antennasys, Inc. v. Aqyr Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Preston v. NagelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. SassoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.