State v. Jones
Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer
1Opinion of the Court
Richards, C. J.:
Since the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States granting the right of franchise to women, the question of their eligibility for jury duty has arisen a number of times in both the Federal and State Courts. It has been recently considered by the Supreme Court of the United States in two very interesting and able decisions. Ballard et al. v. United States, 329 U. S. 187, 67 S. Ct. 261; Fay v. People of State of New York, 332 U. S. 261, 67 S. Ct. 1613.
' The qualifications for both grand and petit jurors in the Federal Courts have been fixed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rawlins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SMITHNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Philpot v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Philpot v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965