Legal Opinion

Sullice v. Gradenigo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of St. Martin, Simon, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDueeel, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover from the succession of Joseph Francois Machet, certain landed property and movable effects, inventoried as belonging-to the deceased, but which the plaintiff claims as his own, under a contract of sale, bearing date 4lh May, 1858. This sale was made by Machet to the plaintiff, for the sum of $1200, in deduction whereof tho vendee gave in payment two notes of the vendor, dated 27th December, 1856, and secured by mortgage on the laud in question ; the mortgage was executed on the 27th December, 1856. The two notes amounted, with the addition of the interest due…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gontier v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Succession of BishopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Hayes v. FryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API