Legal Opinion

Davis v. Friedlander

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1882No. 170PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of fhe United States for ' the Western District of Tennessee. Friedlander, Stich, &. Co., sued Kaufman, their debtor, in the law court of Memphis, taking out an attachment, which was levied, Nov. 30, 1866, upon-his real estate in that" city. On different days in December, 1866, and-January, 1867, Davis and other creditors sued him in the chancery court, each taking out an- attachment, which was promptly levied on the. same real estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of fhe United States for ' the Western District of Tennessee. Friedlander, Stich, &. Co., sued Kaufman, their debtor, in the law court of Memphis, taking out an attachment, which was levied, Nov. 30, 1866, upon-his real estate in that" city. On different days in December, 1866, and-January, 1867, Davis and other creditors sued him in the chancery court, each taking out an- attachment, which was promptly levied on the. same real estate. On the 14th of July, 1868, he was adjudged a bankrupt upon his petition, filed the 30th of the preceding May, — more than a…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

In Doe v. Childress (21 Wall. 642), we considered the effect of proceedings in bankruptcy upon an attachment issued from a State court and levied upon the property of the bankrupt, more than four months prior to their commencement. That was an action of ejectment, by the assignee of a bankrupt, to recover land claimed by the defendant under a decretal sale in an attachment suit in a State court against the bankrupt. ' The latter was declared a bankrupt ten months after the institution of the attachment suit, four months before the decree therein, and seven months prior to' the sale at which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Doe v. ChildressSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dimock v. Revere Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Frank v. VollkommerSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Hoehn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API