Legal Opinion

Van Nest v. Van Nest

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 5, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The ' Chiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Polliak v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Daly v. RogersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. In Re HosfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API