Legal Opinion

Eiland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1999No. 04-98-00722-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

William Roy Eiland (“Eiland”) appeals the trial court’s judgment, revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. In his sole point of error, Eiland asserts that the sentence was cruel and unusual punishment under both the United States and Texas Constitutions because he had already served approximately ten years of court-ordered supervision. We overrule Eiland’s point of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Procedural History

In 1989, Eiland pled guilty to possessing a forged check and was sentenced to five years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fielding v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  3. Krumboltz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank Hernandez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  2. Jake Henry Oglesby v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Spencer, William Wayne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API