Finance Security Co. v. Stuart
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, Judge.
This suit was instituted hy the plaintiff via ordinaria on a promissory note executed by the defendant to bearer. A recognition and preservation of a chattel mortgage and vendor’s lien securing the note *354was asked. The original petition did not allege the plaintiff was a holder in due course, and exceptions of no right and no cause of action were filed. These exceptions were argued and taken under advisement: by the Court, but before a decision thereon plaintiff -filed a supplemental and amended petition, alleging petitioner was the holder and owner of the note in due course for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Royal Furniture Co. v. FillionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- First National Bank v. MarcinkowskaDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1967
- Hymel v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960