Legal Opinion

Finance Security Co. v. Stuart

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1954No. 3877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

This suit was instituted hy the plaintiff via ordinaria on a promissory note executed by the defendant to bearer. A recognition and preservation of a chattel mortgage and vendor’s lien securing the note *354was asked. The original petition did not allege the plaintiff was a holder in due course, and exceptions of no right and no cause of action were filed. These exceptions were argued and taken under advisement: by the Court, but before a decision thereon plaintiff -filed a supplemental and amended petition, alleging petitioner was the holder and owner of the note in due course for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Royal Furniture Co. v. FillionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. First National Bank v. MarcinkowskaDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1967
  5. Hymel v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API