Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Dennis Vieth
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2005No. 04-1451PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Michael Dennis Vieth appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine. Vieth argues that the district court 1 erred when it admitted evidence of prior bad acts under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) and when it denied his motion for a new trial based upon alleged Brady and Jencks Act violations. We affirm on both counts.
I
On June 20, 2001, a grand jury returned an indictment against Vieth, Brent Bast, Susan Marsolek, and James Starkey for: (1) conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Terrance SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Eugene Arthur BlaylockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Esteban Hernandez-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.