Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. McKee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1928No. 20977. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of restraining the collection and enforcement of a judgment and to cancel an attorney’s lien thereon. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment enjoining and restraining the defendants from enforcing the judgment complained of, but adjudging that the attorney’s lien should not be cancelled or expunged from the record. From that part of the judgment refusing to cancel the attorney’s lien, the plaintiffs appeal.

No statement of facts or hill of exceptions has been brought to this court, and the only question is whether the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. St. John v. DiefendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  5. Whitney Chevrolet Co. v. HatchWashington Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API