Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States Department of the Air Force

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 27, 2004No. 02-5342Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GARLAND, Circuit Judge,

concurring in Parts ILB and II.E., and dissenting in Parts II.C and II.D:

This court has twice thought it “passing strange” that “the prices charged to the government for specific goods could be confidential” commercial information or “trade secrets” under the Freedom of Information and Trade Secrets Acts. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. NASA, 180 F.3d 303, 306 (D.C.Cir.1999); see McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Widnall, 57 F.3d 1162, 1167 (D.C.Cir.1995). We have never decided that fundamental question, however, because the government has never litigated whether such prices are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for BroadcastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API