Mark Gaither v. Indiana Dept. of Correction
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
In this case, the Plaintiff was convicted of two counts of child molesting. In 1999, the General Assembly enacted two statutes requiring that sex offenders on probation and/or parole be prohibited from living within 1,000 feet of a school. These statutes were enacted several years after the Plaintiff committed his offenses. Accordingly, Plaintiff contends that the residency restriction placed on him by the statutes violates the Ex Post Facto Clause contained in the Indiana Constitution.
Insofar as conditions of probation must reasonably relate to the offender’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Horseman v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayron Bell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Alvino Pizano v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Katelin Eunjoo Seo v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2020