Legal Opinion

Trevor v. Colgate

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

These are separate appeals from the same decree. The proceeding was a bill in chancery for partition. Certain of the appellants, who were necessary defendants to the bill and against whom the decree passed, are minors and residents of the State of New York. The decree must be reversed for the reason the court did not obtain jurisdiction of the persons of these defendants.

The decree recites: “Due proof of publication notice of the pendency of this cause has been had on the said infant defendants for at least thirty days before the first day of the term.” This recital is insufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keefer v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Smith v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hickenbotham v. BlackledgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Figge v. RowlenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Herbert v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1926
  4. Pfeil v. LoebAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Reynolds v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API