Legal Opinion
URS Corp. v. Lebanese Co. for the Development & Reconstruction of Beirut Central District SAL
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 28, 2007No. Civ. 06-415-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 30, 2006, plaintiff URS Corporation (“URS”) filed this action against defendant, the Lebanese Company for the Development and Reconstruction of Bei rut, Central District SAL (“SOLIDERE”), based on its inclusion in an arbitration proceeding currently underway in Paris, France. (D.I. 1 at ¶ 3) Before the court are SOLIDERE’s motion to dismiss (D.I. 32) based on lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, and URS’s motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin arbitration (D.I. 36). On March 23, 2007,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CRT Capital Group v. SLS Capital, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Adtile Technologies Inc. v. Perion Network Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. ZhangDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Mitas Endustri Sanayi Ticaret A.S. v. Valmont Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Vicor Corporation v. FII USA Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024