Legal Opinion

State v. Shoemaker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1853Published

ERROR to the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Indictment against a licensed grocer for vending spirituous liquor to a minor, without the consent of his parent, &c.

Motion to quash in the Circuit Court sustained.

The indictment professes to meet the requisitions of *101s. 95, c. 53, of the R. S. 1843. It is objected that the language of that section is not followed. The statute reads, that if a licensed grocer,&c., “sell, &c.,to a minor, without the consent of his parent or guardian.” The indictment runs, “without the consent of his parent,” omitting the words, “or guardian.”

A. L. Robinson, for the state. J. Pitcher, for the defendant.

It is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GoochIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API