Legal Opinion

Falsetto v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1898No. 2730PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

The respondent was charged in the municipal court of the city of Seattle with violating section one of ordinance Ho. 3529 of said city, entitled, “An ordinance to define who are disorderly persons, to provide a punishment therefor, and repealing ordinance Ho. 1818 and ordinance Ho. 2360.” Section two of the ^ordinance is as follows:

“Every person enumerated and described in section one of this ordinance is a disorderly person and shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be' punished by a fine not exceeding $500, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State ex rel. Reser v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Weymouth v. LockhartWashington Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API