Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Dantas

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2018No. 2018 NYSlipOp 50060(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Wilson III, Plaintiff,

against

Daniel Valente Dantas, OPPORTUNITY EQUITY PARTNERS, LTD., OPPORTUNITY EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P., and OPPORTUNITY INVEST II, Inc., Defendants.

650915/12

For plaintiff: Terrence G. Reed, Esq., of Lankford & Reed, PLLC

For defendants: Philip C. Korologos, Esq., of Boies, schiller & Flexner LLP

Charles E. Ramos, J.

In motion sequence 010, defendants Daniel Valente Dantas, Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. and Opportunity Invest II, Inc. move for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint (complaint) in its entirety.

In motion sequence 015, plaintiff Robert E.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Express Industries & Terminal Corp. v. New York State Department of TransportationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Abrams v. DonatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Hart v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API