Legal Opinion

Boyden v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

MotioH to retax costs, heard at Rail Terra, 1880, of Ca-Rarbxts Superior Court, before Seymour, J. Motion refused and defendant appealed*

1Opinion of the Court

RüitfíN, J.

This was a ihotion of the dcfendaht to rtb form a bill of costs that had been taxed a.gainst him in the above entitled cause. The action Was begun in the.superior court of Rowan county, and at Spring term, 18?5, thereof, the presiding judge made thefollowing Order.* “Ordered by the court that this cause be removed to the superior court of Iredell county for trial.” A transcript of the record was forwarded and the cause entered on the docket of the court in Iredell; but at fall term, 1875, thereof, the judge holding that court made the following order : “Ordered that the cause be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emery v. . HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Freeman v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. State v. . SeabornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API