Legal Opinion
Huish v. Fenkell
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1934No. 5327PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a dissolution bond which the defendants executed for the purpose of securing the release of an automobile from an attachment levied by the plaintiff in an action against the defendants Fenkell. The bond reads as follows:
“Know all men by these presents, That we P. D. Fenkell and Ida Fenkell, of Eureka, Utah, as principal, and Mrs. Agnes O’Connor and Robert Laird of Eureka, Utah, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto Charles E. Huish, execution plaintiff in the above entitled case in the District Court of Nephi, Juab County,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re HiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Patch v. WesselsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Blume v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Larsen v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Salt Lake City v. BrintonUtah Supreme Court · 1914