Legal Opinion

Huish v. Fenkell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1934No. 5327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ELIAS HANSEN, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a dissolution bond which the defendants executed for the purpose of securing the release of an automobile from an attachment levied by the plaintiff in an action against the defendants Fenkell. The bond reads as follows:

“Know all men by these presents, That we P. D. Fenkell and Ida Fenkell, of Eureka, Utah, as principal, and Mrs. Agnes O’Connor and Robert Laird of Eureka, Utah, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto Charles E. Huish, execution plaintiff in the above entitled case in the District Court of Nephi, Juab County,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Patch v. WesselsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Blume v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Larsen v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commercial Nat. Bank of Salt Lake City v. BrintonUtah Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API