Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Taliaferro

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1959No. Civ. 18287PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

The superior court granted judgment that appellant “take nothing by” his seventh amended complaint and refused to enter a default judgment for appellant.

We consider the validity of the lower court’s action as to each of the six counts of the complaint and as to its refusal to render judgment by default.

Count One seeks to vacate the “court’s action” in approving a settlement agreement, entered into on December 1, 1943, which divided the community property and provided for the support of appellant’s wife and minor children. Appellant claims he was induced to sign the settlement agreement “to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Ponce v. Tractor Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Auberry Union School District v. RaffertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API