Legal Opinion

State v. Najar

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1986No. 8989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRUMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his convictions for larceny over $100 and burglary. Two issues were raised in the docketing statement. The issue not briefed is deemed abandoned. State v. Fish, 102 N.M. 775, 701 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 102 N.M. 734, 700 P.2d 197 (1985). The remaining issue is whether defendant was deprived of his constitutional rights to due process and effective assistance of counsel in that he was not evaluated to determine his competency to stand trial, his ability to form specific intent, and his sanity at the time of the offenses. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Van White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. BoyettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. TafoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API