Legal Opinion
Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul Copenhaver
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2016No. 14-16399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, No. 14-16399 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:13-cv-01750-SMS PAUL COPENHAVER, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Sandra M. Snyder, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 7, 2016 Pasadena, California Filed May 25, 2016 Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Barry G. Silverman, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Silverman Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Tashima 2 RODRIGUEZ V.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Andrew Moore v. B. BirkholzDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016