Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the pro se motion of defendant to dismiss the indictment based on the People’s failure to notify him of his right to testify in a prospective Grand Jury proceeding (see, CPL 190.50 [5] [a]). The motion was made more than five days after defendant’s arraignment and was therefore untimely (see, CPL 190.50 [5] [c]). Further, although defendant was not entitled to the statutory notice because he was not subject to an “undisposed of felony complaint” in a local criminal court (CPL 190.50 [5] [a]; see, People v Akel, 267 AD2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. BourdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. AkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. BoodrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API