Romine v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted for rape and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. The only question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a statement handwritten by the defendant while he was confined in jail and before he was given his warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436,86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
The sufficiency of the evidence is not contested. There was no motion to exclude the State's evidence, no request for any written charge and no mention for a new trial. Thompson v.State, 347 So.2d 1371, 1373…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Yelton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Vines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kinder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Trawick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Wyrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Cross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- McCall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.