Legal Opinion

Lifshitz v. McConnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Alexander Lifshitz, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendants, entered on the 4th day of June, 1902, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, J.:

The appellant contends that the judgment is void for want of jurisdiction. The suit is brought to recover an alleged balance of $216.73 for goods sold and delivered, and the answer, in addition to a general denial, sets up a breach of warranty and damages resulting therefrom. The court allowed the plaintiff’s claim in full and also allowed the defendants the sum of $657.58 damages for the alleged breach of warranty, judgment being rendered in the latter’s favor for the difference, viz., $440.85, with costs. The chief contention on the appellant’s part is, that as the amount of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huber v. EhlersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lowenberg Co. v. BlockAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API