Legal Opinion

In Re Enstar Group, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 9, 1994No. 19-80139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON OBJECTION TO CLAIMS OF WILLIAM GAUNTT AND AARON ARONOV

A. POPE GORDON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Enstar Group, Inc. filed an objection, as amended, to the unsecured claims of William Gauntt and Aaron Aronov. 1

The parties submitted the objection to the court based on briefs and arguments of counsel.

The claims arise out of Enstar Group’s alleged obligation to indemnify Gauntt and Aronov from claims against them as directors and officers of Enstar Group.

The undisputed facts are as follows.

Enstar Group entered into an indemnity agreement with its directors and officers based upon Enstar’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. PostinWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Insurance Corporation of Ireland, Ltd. v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University and Richard Moy, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Transport Trailer Service, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Fashion Tanning Co. v. Fulton County Electrical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Integrity Insurance Co. v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reliance Insurance v. Enstar Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API