Legal Opinion

Ranney v. Henry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket No. 17Published

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Assumpsit by Frederick T. Ranney against Albert M. Henry and another for commissions on the sale of real estate. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant Henry on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The defendant and his son, Burns Henry, were the owners of a valuable piece of real estate on Jefferson avenue, Detroit, and in 1906 they commenced negotiations with Mr. and Mrs. E. J. Schmidt for a sale of the property to them. The price originally fixed was $65,000, but this price was reduced from time to time. It appears that Mr. Henry had also negotiated with a Mr. Turnbull, a real estate agent, to assist him in effect*598ing a sale to the Schmidts. While these negotiations were thus pending, the plaintiff induced Mr. Edward E. Marschner, who was one of the assessors of the city of Detroit,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barrett v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API