Legal Opinion

Brunskill v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1937No. 43770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.

In brief outline, plaintiffs’ petition charges that on the 8th day of November, 1934, the defendant F. B. Wallace (who will- hereafter be referred to as the father) conveyed to his son and codefendant, Frank D.,.the father’s interest in certain real estate. This interest consisted of one-third of certain property derived through the death of the wife and mother of these defendants. The plaintiffs allege .that at the time of this transfer the father was indebted to the bank in a substantial sum, and was wholly insolvent; that the conveyance was made for the express purpose of hindering and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Central Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Goeb v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Uttvits v. PolsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API