Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alcombrack v. Ciccarelli

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 3, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0148Published

1Dissent

JOHNSEN,

Judge, dissenting:

¶ 22 I respectfully dissent. My view is that under duty principles already established in Arizona, if the Ciccarellis’ default authorized the lender to enter the home and change the locks, they owed a duty to take reasonable steps to prevent resulting personal injury to the locksmith the lender sent to do that.

¶ 23 As the Majority states, although a landlord who has leased the entirety of the property usually has no duty as landowner to one who comes onto the land, that does not mean the landowner necessarily owes no other duty to the entrant. It only means that no…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Courtney v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. La Raia v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. April Abigail Guerra v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API