Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Lurcy

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 22, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

Frae"keítthaler, S.

The testator, a citizen of the United States and a resident of New York, died here, leaving a will which disposed of all his property “ except [his] French property.” The will defines the term, “ French property.” It has been duly admitted to probate in this court.

The decedent also executed a holographic will disposing of the French property. That will was made in New York. Being unwitnessed, it is not validly executed under the laws of this State. An expert in the foreign law states that the will is not properly executed under the law of France, that the French courts will…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wager v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. In re HaughianNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  3. In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of MaccafilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of MaccaffilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API