Legal Opinion

Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Commercial Pacific Cable Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1909No. 1,687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Territory of Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The very voluminous record in this cause renders it impossible to review the evidence in detail in an opinion of reasonable length, so that we will not undertake to do more 'than indicate the grounds upon which we rest our judgment.

The appeal of the Commercial Pacific Cable Company, which was the libelant in the court below, is upon the ground that the amount awarded it by the trial court was inadequate, and that the court also erred in dividing, as it did, costs between the respective parties. What we shall say in respect to the main appeal, which is that taken by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The" Sabine"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. The Bello Corrunes. The Spanish ConsulSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. The SandringhamDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1882
  4. The BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1833
  5. Spreckels v. The State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Fair OaksDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
  2. Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Waimanalo Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  3. The Celtic ChiefCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  4. The AuroraDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API