Legal Opinion

People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

The main questions raised by the appellant relate to the corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice. “A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime.” (Code Crim. Proc. § 399.) This corroboration by “ other evidence ” differs from that of the corroboration of a confession. (Code Crim. Proc. § 395.) There the statute requires “ additional proof that the crime charged has been committed.” There must be evidence in addition to the confession simply…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. People v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. People v. . KupperschmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. People v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HaskallNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API