Hinton v. Cline
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The plaintiff assigns as error the refusal of the trial judge to set the verdict aside and award him a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of the damages.
The granting or the denying of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury are excessive or inadequate is within the sound discretion of the trial judge. McClamroch v. Ice Co., 217 N.C. 106, 6 S.E. 2d 850; Johnston v. Johnston, 213 N.C. 255, 195 S.E. 807; Waller v. Hipp, 208 N.C. 117, 179 S.E. 428; Blum v. R. R., 187 N.C. 640, 122 S.E. 562; Hoke v. Whisnant, 174 N.C. 658, 94 S.E. 446; Harvey v. Railroad…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Phillips v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Dixon v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Spinella v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.