Legal Opinion

Newsome v. Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1917No. 8244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action on insurance policy; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. October 8, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

The plaintiff’s evidence showed that the death of the insured was caused by a visible and external wound in his chest, which had been inflicted by some sharp instrument. No other fact or circumstance as to how the wound was caused was shown, except the statement (contained in a letter written by the plaintiff and addressed to the defendant, notifying it of the death of the insured) that the insured “died . from being stabbed by a negro on the streets.” This statement by the plaintiff must be taken as being prima facie true, as against her interests. Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Newsome v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Fair v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Hill v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Travelers Insurance v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Continental Assurance Co. v. RothellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Continental Assurance Co. v. RothellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Newsome v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API